American Voice Radio Network, know as AVRN, is an alternative (as opposed to the main stream corporate media), non-corporate, non-business, American free press (as referenced in Amendment I [originally Article the third of the Bill of Rights] of the Constitution of the United States of America & Article I, Section 1 & 8 of the State of Oregon constitution) not-registered, not-licensed, constitutionally ordained and protected entity (the press).
AVRN began its first satellite (C-band) / internet (16k mp3) /SW (WBCQ) broadcast in 2004 as an extension of The American Voice Newspaper which was a nationally available subscription newspaper (copies available in limited number as a thank you for certain donations upon request) that I also distributed in my local area for free wherever businesses would allow me to place it. American Voice Newspaper was first published in 1998.
Through the newspaper I (Francis Steffan [family name is private] is the creator and steward of American Voice Radio Network (AVRN) in Eagle Point, Oregon. If you want to read more about him go to “The Frank Report” archives.) began to get radio interview offers, which I always accepted. This, in time, encouraged me to start my own radio show called The American Voice Hour (once a week on Saturday nights).
Around this time I began to see the dishonest, backstabbing, money grubbing and infiltrated underbelly of the “Patriot” movement that I had until that time thought of as the hope for America.
I started American Voice Radio Network (AVRN) in 2004 primarily because “patriots” were being taken off the air of “patriot/freedom/christian” media outlets when someone with more money came by and wanted the time or an advertiser didn’t like what they heard. For several months I produced the radio network and published the newspaper. Eventually I realized I could no longer do both, there didn’t seem to be enough hours in the day and the diminishing support for the printed word made it clear to me to exclusively focus on the radio network.
AVRN was created to give “average” Americans an opportunity to be heard. In order to fulfill that mandate we had to figure an alternative way to fund network operations. We needed something different than the advertiser controlled and manipulated system utilized by the mainstream media and sadly many so-called “alternative” media outlets today. Too many so-called “radio networks” are just an echo chamber of the most popular “conservative” hosts that they rebroadcast/simulcast in order to have content to wrap their advertising around. AVRN strives to create unique original content. AVRN has continuously broadcast 24/7 since 2004.
The advertiser controlled “system” is currently being used to strip you tube content makers from advertising monetization. You tube calls it an “advertiser friendly” policy. What this means is that the international corporations funding the you tube platform through advertising dollars get to dictate what information providers get paid and what information providers don’t, just like mainstream media and far too many so-called “alternative” media do. This is NOT a censorship problem it is a “operating model” problem. This is why you never see exposes’ on the mainstream media outlets about the pharmaceutical industry, the public health hazards of the homosexual lifestyle, the health dangers of fluoride, aspartame, high fructose corn syrup, vaccinations and any other topic major advertisers do not want exposed because they are making profit and gain by the damaging activities they seek to deny the public knowledge of.
AVRN hosts equal trade compensate for their own airtime. The hosts can sell ad spots to help with, completely cover their airtime costs or more. The idea is that a host is far less likely to get an advertiser that will disagree with their presentation than a random advertiser may. AVRN does make advertising opportunities available but is very selective and never ever takes council from advertisers concerning network content. As long as “money,” or the illusion of money, is a driving fuel in our civilization there may be no perfect solution, but we here at AVRN work hard not to let it interfere with content.
AVRN is not a “legal entity” of any kind, has no employees, has no officers and is not created to “make a profit” and is not a “business.” AVRN is “the press,” as described in and protected by the constitution for the united states
NOTICE OF CREED
This document is NOTICE of CREED for the Francis Steffan and serves as both repudiation and rebuttal to any and all direct or implied presumptions to the contrary of any direct or implied declarations within this document.
I, Francis Steffan, am a man made by the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob in the image of That God as declared within the Holy Bible at Genesis 1: 26-28 where man is not only created in Gods image but also given dominion over the earth and its beasts; therefore I cannot be a “’beast’ / ‘animal’” or “evolved from an animal or animal ‘man’” as claimed in 21 U.S.C.A. §321(f)(g)(1)(h)(2) (‘man or other animals;) and (v), TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE §431.002(14) and other state and federal statutes and regulations. I therefore cannot be and withhold understanding, acceptance and consent to being deemed or presumed an animal and/or an evolved man, in anyway under any circumstances at any time.
My God given Right to worship The Almighty Father God of Abraham, Issac, Jacob and Jesus according to the dictates of my own conscience and the free exercise thereof is protected by the First Amendment (third original article) to the Constitution for the United States of America, Constitution of the State of Oregon, Article I, sections 2, 3 & 4, The Declaration of Independence and the Northwest Ordinance.
I, Francis Steffan, am not a “person,” natural or otherwise and not an “Individual” and withhold understanding, acceptance and consent to be deemed or presumed to be a “person” or “Individual.” All men are created equal in right, “persons” are not created equal. A “person” may purchase and own another “person,” I am forbidden that; however corporations are defined as “persons” and corporations can and do purchase and own other corporations, other “persons.” It is self evident that “persons” are not men.
I, Francis Steffan, rejects and does not accept the United States, any other State, “person,” or man’s non Christian imaginations of religion to be applied to Francis Steffan. “Homo Sapien” is a term associated with the evolution religion and the name Homo sapiens was applied in 1758 by the father of modern biological classification, Carolus Linnaeus. At the time it was a daring act to classify man within the same framework used for animals.
Why would declaring “man” a “homo sapien” be daring? Because “back in the day” Christians took the word of God seriously, as does Francis Steffan, and realized they were being characterized as “animals” by a pagan religion. Paganism is best described as a group of religions and spiritual traditions based on a reverence for nature, the belief that “evolution” is the basis of man’s creation and existence is a reverence for nature and therefore qualifies as “pagan religion.” As stated within the book “The Blind Watchmaker,” that Amazon describes as, “Richard Dawkins’s classic remains the definitive argument for our modern understanding of evolution,” states, “Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.”
Some of you may decry that “evolution is a scientific theory not religion.” Evolutionists will tell you that the “theory of evolution” is fact and theory.
Evolutionism is a religion, based on “facts” such as Orthogenesis, also known as orthogenetic evolution, progressive evolution, evolutionary progress, or progressionism, which is nothing more than a biological hypothesis. A hypothesis used in science is an assumption based on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.
Assumption: “A thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.” Oxford Dictionary.
Evolution used as a means to explain man’s creation and existence is a theory that claims a “hypothesis” as a “fact” and then claim that “fact” makes the “theory” true. In other words, a religion.
The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines “religion” as, “a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith.” The Oxford Dictionary defines “religion” as, “A particular system of faith and worship.” and “A pursuit or interest followed with great devotion.“
Homo Sapien: “The primate species to which modern humans belong; humans regarded as a species.” “A member of the Homo Sapiens species; a human being.”
Primate: “A mammal of an order that includes the lemurs, bushbabies, tarsiers, marmosets, monkeys, apes, and humans.” Oxford Dictionary.
The United States government is in violation of the United States Constitution at Amendment I wherein it dictates, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”
At 1 U.S. Code Sec. 8(a) the United States government has made law that states, “In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.”
Further, The Constitution for the United States of America declares in part at the Fourth Amendment (sixth original article): “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”
As is self evident, people possess “persons” as they would houses, papers and effects, “Persons” are not “the people’. Instead, “persons” are attributes or capacities of “people”. “People” are real and primary; “persons” are relational, derivative and/or secondary; therefore I am not a “person.” Corporations are deemed to be “persons.” Corporations are not people they are a “legal entity,” a fiction created by men or persons, by privilege not right, to facsimile certain attributes of man from behind the “corporate veil” or mask.
“Person” derives from the Latin ‘persona,’ an actor’s mask, men combined wearing the mask of a “legal entity” create a “person,” a singular man wearing the mask of a “legal entity” is a “natural person.” In Roman civil law jus personarum did not mean law of persons, or rights of people, but law of status, condition or character. A person is not a Holy Bible, Genesis 1: 26-28 physical man, but the status or condition with which he is invested. (34 Austins Jur., 363.) In context, an “individual” is merely a singular “person.”
“Individual” is a description of a singular THING not the THING itself and is a nonsensical description when lacking the subject of description and not accepted by Francis Steffan as a description in any way other than “individual man created by God and in God’s image,” which is redundant and unnecessary as man is singular and men is plural without the need of an additional singular/plural descriptor.
I, Francis Steffan, withhold consent to being classified as a “human” and/or “human being” as the etymology of the word(s) strongly suggest that, human is another derivative of “a man made in the image of God” but not the man, much as “person” is derivative of a Holy Bible at Genesis 1: 26-28 man: Human (adj.) mid-15c., humain, humaigne, “human,” from Old French humain, umain (adj.) “of or belonging to man” (12c.), from Latin humanus “of man, human.” Human (n.) “a human being,” 1530s, from human (adj.). In some Indo european language families, the ‘animals on the earth’ is narrowed to mean ‘humans’, theanimal on earth.
I, Francis Steffan, at all times in all places, withhold consent to take on the character, status, mask, veil, persona, or surety of an artificial juristic persona by any name, for any reason unless specifically agreed to in writing by me, for a specific period of time for a specific and fully disclosed purpose; and witnessed by at least two others of my choosing. Therefore, no claim and/or presumption can be justifiably upheld that I am a “person,” “natural person,” “individual,” “human,” “human being” or any other legal entity, or any other fiction relational derivative of a “Man made in the image of God.”
I am nothing more nor less than a man created by God in the image of God and ONLY a man created by God in the image of God. I stand on my natural, God given right, to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of my own conscience.
I am one of the “People” on the land known as The State of Oregon, one of the several States of The United States of America, a perpetual Union, as stiled in The articles of Confederation; therefore I am not a citizen of, nor am “resident” within any federal zone, federal district, federal territory, federal enclave, federal property or anything of the kind or relating to the “District of Columbia,” or any other foreign government or legal fiction whatsoever.
Constitution of The State of Oregon, and the Constitution for the United States of America both fail to rise to the status and character of a contract; as both fail the necessary elements of a contract. Only if the main elements of a contract exist can a “contract” be a legally enforceable contract or a “contract” at all. The constitution has been bestowed the status of a “compact” which is not a contract in anyway, it is simply a loose agreement between “states” and/or their subdivisions. “No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it.” Padelford, Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah,14 Ga. 438.
In any regard I, Francis Steffan Hayes, withhold consent to any contractual agreement with any state whatsoever unless specific and particular terms, and particular definitions of those terms, for specific purposes, for a specific time frame are disclosed in full and agreed to by me in writing, and witnessed by two people of my choosing. At no time in any place whatsoever are any actions I make to be presumed, inferred or understood to be consent to any agreement, understanding or contract with any state whatsoever. Further, I at no time, at no place, for any reason make any pledge whatsoever unless in writing and signed by me with the specifics of the pledge, full disclosure of obligations and clear wording that designates the writing as a pledge.
For an express trust to be valid, the trust instrument must show certainty of intention, subject matter and object. Certainty of intention means that it must be clear that the settlor or testator wishes to create a trust; this is not dependent on any particular language used, and a trust can be created without the word “trust” being used, or even the settlor knowing he is creating a trust. Certainty of subject matter means that it must be clear what property is part of the trust. Historically the property must have been segregated from non-trust property; more recently, the courts have drawn a line between tangible and intangible assets, holding that with intangible assets there is not always a need for segregation. Certainty of objects means that it must be clear who the beneficiaries, or objects, are. The trust must then be formally constituted, by the transfer of its property to the trustees.
WE THE PEOPLE (1-Grantors) of the United States (from or out of the peoples United/Joined Nobility), in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common Defense, promote the General Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty (2-Statement of Purpose Note: Blessings come from God) to ourselves and our Posterity (3-Grantees: Heirs unnamed), do ordain and establish (4- Statement of Intent. Note: Ordain comes from Christian/Cannon Law) this Constitution (5-Written Indenture) for the United States of America (Joined Nobility belonging to America: 6-The Name of the Entity Created)
The Preamble fulfills the 6 requirements necessary to establish a Trust. Rights, Privileges and Prerogatives of Commoners to Royalty are considered intangible property (incorporeal heredatiments) inheritable by decent and intangible property may only devolve to a Body Politic via Trust. All those combined Properties are spoils from the War for Independence.
It is self evident by the wording that the intention of the authors of The Constitution for the United States of America was to create a “beneficent” trust relationship to administer the intangible property of sovereignty and/or liberty for themselves and their posterity.
As one of “The People” on the land in The State of Oregon, one of the several States of The United States of America, a perpetual Union, as stiled in The articles of Confederation, I am a beneficiary of the trust relationship created by the Constitution of The State of Oregon, one of the several States of The United States of America, a perpetual Union, as stiled in The articles of Confederation and I at all times instruct and demand the fiduciaries, (ORS165.075(4) Fiduciary means a trustee, guardian, executor, administrator, receiver or any other person acting in a fiduciary capacity as agent or employee of an organization which is a fiduciary.) in whatever capacity I find them, to execute the trust on my behalf for my benefit; I at no time consent to be surety in any way whatsoever. By virtue of being one of the people of one of the several States of the union I am also a beneficiary of the trust relationship known as the Constitution for the United States of America, a perpetual Union, as stiled in The articles of Confederation, to whatever extent it applies to the People, and I at all times demand the fiduciaries, in whatever capacity I find them, to execute the trust on my behalf for my benefit; I at no time consent to be surety in any way whatsoever.
I, Francis Steffan, at all times, under all circumstances whatsoever do always reserve all my rights and exercise them as I see fit within the parameters of not violating the other Peoples Rights.
I am a beneficiary of “federalism” as declared by The Supreme Court of the United States in Bond v US case no. 09-1227. Unless otherwise expressly and voluntarily agreed by me in writing over my actual hand-written signature witnessed by two men or women of my choosing. I exercise my actual rights of religious and political freedom of choice to declare that the venue of all of my conduct, speech, writings, agreements, residence and domicile is: without the singular “United States” and actually on the soil within the physical boundaries of The County of Jackson located within the border of The State of Oregon, one of the several member States of the perpetual Union styled “The United States of America”; that all of my conduct is intentional; that all of my acts and intentions take place in a Year of our Lord; that I act at arm’s length and without prejudice to my capacity as a sovereign Dei gratia; that my duty of obedience is only to that government that exists under the authority granted by our Father in Heaven, the God of Abraham, Issac, Jacob, as per Romans 13:3-7 and is consistent with the express charitable trust called “The Constitution of The State of Oregon” and “The Organic Law of The United States of America”; that I have not knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily consented to be subject by virtue of mere statute, rule, regulation, emergency, or alleged moral obligation to the authority of any unincorporated/incorporated implied charitable trust; that I deny that I am acting in the territorial jurisdiction of “this state” or any other legal fiction; that I deny representing any collective entity unless I have expressly agreed under oath to do so; that my purposes are at all times religious first and/or political second and dedicated to restoring understanding and respect for the spiritual principles which provide the foundation for the republican form of government guaranteed at Article 4 Section 4 of The Constitution of the United States ratified in A.D. 1788 and by Article 1 Section 1 of The Constitution of The State of Oregon. I do not consent to be cast in a false light.
Any and All statements, claims and/or commentary heard or viewed from AVRN on whatever platform are the sole responsibility of the man or woman speaking or posting the idea. All content on AVRN is intended to be educational and/or political commentary and/or religious in nature.